Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Current Events: All in One and One for All

Facebook’s ongoing success pervades the headlines: “Microsoft to Pay $240 Million for Stake in Facebook”, “Web companies looking to replicate Facebook's success”, and “New Mobile Social Networks” which interact with Facebook from your cell phone. Like other successful hardware and software of it's day, it has discovered the key to success: to accomplish all, in one.

For years there have been sites that allow you to create an account to upload pictures from a family reunion or sites that facilitate online chatting, blogging or file exchange. There have been sites for community calendars, for class forums, and for finding past acquaintances. But who wants to create an account on 50 different sites? Just as the iPhone brought together an MP3 player, a palm pilot with internet access, and a phone (to name a few of the device’s features), Facebook is finding ways to merge the essence of hundreds of websites into one. Whether software or hardware, consolidation is the future.

In the next few decades the vision will only expand. Instead of having a myriad of keys or a wallet with a driver’s license, money, coupons, IDs, credit cards, and whatever else, all of that information will be stored in a single, universally-accepted device; the newest iPhone. Everyone will have one. Built in to your device is your Facebook account or something similar which, as a minimum, serves for identification. For security it will be activated by fingerprint. Perhaps it will be built in to your finger (chapstick and swiss army knife included). Though the idea seems silly, the principle is a reality: society wants consolidation and from an economic standpoint, society usually gets what it wants.

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Women in Computing: Nurture vs. Nature

It is no one’s place to say what a woman can and can’t do. What concerns me is that people like Senator Wyden push women to be in places that they may not want to be. I know that he has good intentions in providing equal opportunities for women in the field of hard sciences, but statistics are a dangerous way to measure success: people are not statistics. There is a growing trend to fight against conventionalism, to see men and women exactly the same, and to say (as I feel Senator Wyden is saying) that they should be the same. They are not the same. Thus we shouldn’t worry when statistics show that women aren’t doing everything that men are doing and vice versa. Should we be worried if we find that there aren’t as many stay-at-home dads as there are stay-at-home moms? No. It is generally in women’s nature to be more nurturing than men. Is it not possible that it is more in men’s nature than in women's to be drawn to the hard sciences?

In the same breath, I say that though different, men and women should have equal opportunity. Whether it be in upbringing or peer influence in adulthood, a woman should not be “trained” to arrive at a certain destination in life. Her free agency is as precious as that of anyone else. I agree with Senator Wyden’s insight that a female perspective adds beneficial diversity to any field. My point is that while we should be cautious of conventionalism as limiting opportunities for women, we should not overlook that convention is often created because it coincides with the general nature of the individuals concerned.

Thursday, October 18, 2007

Current Events: A Standard of Living

The computer world is just now trying to figure out what the church understood 20 years ago. According to an article by Marcus Browne about office security threats, 85% of employers consider their own employees to be the greatest threat of network exposure to IT threats. The question has been asked for years: how much privacy do you give to your employees?

“Set up the computer in a place where the family regularly can see what is happening on the screen,” says the June 2001 issue of the New Era for LDS youth. Are employees not responsible to their employers the same way children are responsible to their parents? The question is debatable, but the church doesn’t make exceptions for adults using the computers and ultimately, the way I see it, whether it be my house or my business, “if you’re under my roof, you play by my rules. What you do under your roof is up to you.” Reserving the right to search anywhere at anytime for purposes of security is not only reasonable, but largely expected in today’s world.

It seems ironic that the church, which is ancient relative to the dawn of the technological age has adapted so quickly and so adeptly to the changes in society. It is a testimony to the fact that whether socially, academically, emotionally, or politically, you will rarely go wrong modeling your life after gospel standards.

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

The Cuckoo's Egg: Risky Business

There is a fine line between genius and insanity. One can hardly reach for the stars without being first considered a lunatic. In his book The Cuckoo’s Egg, Cliff Stoll faces this conundrum, but does so conscious of the risk of ruin. “The network community depended on me, without even knowing it,” he writes. “Nobody was telling me what to do, yet I had a choice: should I quietly let things drop? Or do I take arms against this sea of troubles?” We all get a chance to do something of consequence in our communities. Even something as small as an idea can lead to a revolutionary change in humanity. But equally possible is the chance of fruitless experiments, rejection, and embarrassment. Cliff Stoll’s account illustrates that conviction shields genius from insanity, that one can determine the significance of their own achievements, and that invaluable experience is gained in the journey itself.

Cliff knew that he was taking big risks by devoting so much of himself to the hacker. But despite those around him who saw his pursuit as a crazed obsession, Cliff was convinced that it was a serious matter that needed to be dealt with. “Something important was entirely up to me,” he writes. When faced with the door of opportunity and when wondering about the severity of the risks, one must consider the conviction that one has to the matter in question. Unfortunately the tendency is to immediately shy away from a challenge once risks have been identified; but when one is convinced that pursuing a challenge is the right course of action, then one is not only justified in persevering, but morally obligated to do so. Stoll was tempted to give up countless times in his investigation, but had he done so, our very nation may have been compromised. Thankfully Stoll realized that a lack of support from his coworkers and superiors did not translate to giving up on what he felt was important.

A more unique twist on the matter of genius versus insanity is how the individual can determine the significance of their own achievements. Often what we know of history is in reality an individual’s take on those events. Stoll’s narrative is no exception. The case in which he invested countless hours didn’t end with a monumental, earth-shattering court case, a cash prize, or even a raise. The recognition he received could be considered to have been minimal. But that’s not how he chose to see it. He wrote a New York Times Bestseller; he celebrated his own personal achievement at having saved the country and caught the hacker. As the author of the story, both figuratively and literally, Cliff wrote himself in as the genius, not the insane. The significance of one’s achievements need not be dependent on others’ opinions and in this light, our individual pursuits become ever more important to us.

This last observation is particularly true when one considers how much is gained simply in the journey itself, regardless of the outcome. The Cuckoo’s Egg shows clearly an evolution in Cliff’s character as he engaged in pursuing the hacker. He came to understand and appreciate computer networking as more than a conglomerate of wires and cables, but a web of mutual trust between members of a community. He came to recognize the value of ethical behavior and yet learned not to assume it. He realized that political boundaries aren’t as black and white as they had once seemed to him and that behind it all there were common interests. His story also shows how his emotions for his girlfriend were defined and refined through his experience chasing the hacker. For Cliff, as for anyone, undertaking a challenge despite great risk becomes a crucible experience, teaching and providing invaluable experience to shape who we are and how we see the world.

A quick glance at the front cover of the book brings us nearly to assume that Cliff’s story will end in success. Though there are moments when his genius is questioned, we hardly expect the author of a New York Times Bestseller to wind up in an insane asylum. But for each of us, as we walk the fine line between genius and insanity, our outcomes are unassured. We can’t let the fear of failure and the risk of ruin deter us from embracing challenge, particularly when we are convinced that what we are doing is right. As the historians of our own lives, we can largely determine the significance of our own outcomes. The pursuits that we undertake will bring with them knowledge and experience that summarize the very purpose of our lives. At the risk of insanity, let us pursue genius.

Tuesday, October 9, 2007

Technology and Family History Work: Robots Saving People

On the one hand, family history work is a personalized pursuit, aimed at helping us define who we are and at learning and helping our deceased ancestors one by one. On the other hand, technology is stereotypically robotic, impersonal, and generalized for the masses. Despite these colossally varied foci, nothing has been or will be as important to the propagation of genealogy work and its associated benefits for personal identity as technology. This is ironic when one considers that the great fear of many with regards to technology is that we are losing our identity to make way for the onslaught of machines and computer software. Is it possible that they are actually contributing to our identity? Family history is a testimony to the fact that technology can and should be used to beautify, enhance, and enrich the personal aspects of our lives. When considered in this light, technology is one of the greatest gifts that God has given for the happiness and well-being of His children. Elder Ballard has said, “much success will come as we become more expert and more able to harness the wonderful technology that our Heavenly Father has given man... Whereas Shakespeare in his time was limited generally to the Globe Theatre, we have a global theater that literally opens doors worldwide”.

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

Kites and Writing


“A kite can’t fly without a string,” as the proverb goes to illustrate that rules don’t tie us down, but keep us up. But how true is this adage?

My friend Matt would say it’s true. You should have seen his face when he whipped open the answer key to his math homework to confirm what he already felt confident was the right answer. After laboriously studying the rules of mathematics, he’d managed to master functional inequalities. He was feeling sky-high.

The students in my italian class say it’s true. I spent an hour in a study session helping them understand the rules for direct and indirect object pronouns. Walking away they said that they felt a lot better about the concepts and I could tell that their love for the language had grown. “It’s the little rules that make italian so beautiful,” I told them. It was a feeling that was mutually understood, like a spiritual surge of emotion.

My roommates would say it’s true. “If any of you guys put up bad pictures in our apartment, it wouldn’t last a second,” one said to the rest of us. He’s convinced that maintaining high moral standards is critical to keeping high spirits. The rest of us are quick to agree.

In school, in sports, in spiritual matters, in life - rules are what make us soar. Often we seem to want the easy way out, the cheap fling, the smooth sailing. But testimonies can readily be found that the most rewarding emotions are precisely that: rewarding. They come as a prize for hard work, for diligent application, for dedicated practice and in all cases, for observance of rules.

As we talk of the rules of writing, why should it be any different? It is no surprise that we “celebrate” writers such as Shakespeare, Frost, and Tolkien. There is something we appreciate in the clarity and inspiration achieved in good writing. There is a crispness, a beauty that makes us want to try harder and to be better. There is something desirable, attractive, and praiseworthy, something we want more of.

We come to stand in awe of the kite, quickly losing from sight and memory that it is the string that makes it fly.